Search www.satyamag.com

Satya has ceased publication. This website is maintained for informational purposes only.

To learn more about the upcoming Special Edition of Satya and Call for Submissions, click here.

back issues

 

March 2001
Coronation Of A Killer

By Michael Clyne

 


The fervor in Florida has quieted and the coronation of George W. “Fratboy” Bush is complete. This is a proper time to consider this man in the context of “Leader of the Free World” and what his ascendancy portends.

Since the Supreme Court decision issued in 1976 lifting the injunction against the death penalty, no state has executed more people than George W. Bush’s adopted homeland of Texas. 2000 was a record year, and this year should prove even more fruitful for advocates of state-sponsored killing. Over the last 25 years, one third of all executions in the U.S. were performed by the state of Texas.

Bush has stated unequivocally that not a single innocent person has been executed by the Texas death house. The numbers and rates of errors in all capital trials belie this certainty. According to the Liebman study completed in 2000, which reviewed all capital cases in all 50 states from 1973 to 1995, the overall error rate nationally was a whopping 68 percent. That is, courts found serious, reversible error in nearly seven out of every ten capital sentences handed down during state trials. (The full study can be found at www.thejusticeproject.org.) The top two reasons for error cited in the study are incompetent defense and the suppression of evidence by the prosecution. The former is the result of inadequate funding to fulfill the guarantee of competent, court-appointed counsel that is the written standard for capital cases. The latter comes about for several reasons: political expediency, career advancement on the part of prosecutors, and the certain knowledge on their part that not a single prosecutor has ever been charged, much less convicted, of illegally suppressing evidence in a capital case.

Cracks in the System
During Governor Bush’s reign in Texas, several cases emerged into the public eye that contained elements casting doubt upon the validity of the rendered verdict. Despite growing evidence nationwide that the system had been imposing sentences of death upon the innocent, Bush signed off on each of the death warrants presented to him. That “presentation” was too often a spoken summary from one of his aides, even though he told the national press that he “studied the merits of each case carefully.”

Proponents of the death penalty have been quick to say, and quite smugly, that the statistics of the Liebman study indicate that the system works, and that it efficiently determines who is or is not actually guilty of capital murder. This of course, cannot be true, as successive classes of journalism students at Northwestern University continue to prove, by becoming the instrument through which at least one person under sentence of death, without possibility of further review, was freed, and several other cases referred to the courts for further review. Utilizing only the publicly accessible trial records, students were able to free Anthony Porter, convicted of two murders and sentenced to death, by obtaining a confession from another person present on the scene of the crimes for which Porter was wrongfully convicted. Without further appeal avenues left to him, Porter was 50 hours away from execution when proof of his innocence was uncovered. This is only one of the more notorious cases, many more have come to light through the efforts of legal foundations, newspaper reporters, and interested citizens. If further evidence of the fallibility of that same argument is required, one need only consider that in the few cases when DNA testing was allowed, after petition to state governors, it has often resulted in proven innocence.

A major factor in the rate of wrongful convictions comes from legislation at the state level. For example, only a certain number of appeals is allowed, and appeals must be filed within a certain time limit or else they cannot be filed at all. Coupled with lack of funds for adequate defense counsel and pre-trial investigation, plus prosecutorial misconduct, the odds that those convicted of a capital crime are indeed guilty of that crime become less likely.

In the last 20 years, the numbers of activities that qualify for the death penalty at the federal level have risen significantly. This is due, in part, to the failed War on Drugs, and also extends to various other crimes, among them murder under special circumstances. There are also political reasons for the expansion of federal capital crimes legislation, primarily the ease with which a presidential candidate can appear to be “tough on crime,” signing new capital crimes legislation into law while knowing that no one has been executed by the federal government since 1963. But that’s about to change.

McVeigh: The First of Many?
Late last year, Timothy McVeigh, convicted on eight counts of murder for the bombing of the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, informed the court that he wished to relinquish his right to any further appeals. This motion was granted, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons set the very first date available by law, May 16, for his execution. McVeigh will die by lethal injection at the federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana where he is currently imprisoned.

One would think, given the extraordinary nature of the crime for which he was convicted, that the media and those in favor of putting inmates to death would be overjoyed by the announcement. McVeigh would be made to pay; and the victims, their families, Oklahoma City, and the nation would finally see closure in this horrific drama.

Think again. Nationally, media commentators opined that this was some sort of trick or power play on the defendant’s part. Locally, here in Oklahoma, there was considerable outrage over his request to abandon the appeals process, as though this signified that McVeigh had any real control over anything beyond that one, legal request. To the nation at large, it would appear that the bombing drew the community in Oklahoma closer together. However, the construct of the victims and their families being of one mind about the case is convenient, but untrue. In fact, there has been considerable fallout in the aftermath of the bombing. Many wonder why so much money has been spent to build an enormous monument on the site of the building, and a museum next door, when some survivors and their families are drowning in medical bills and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the bombing. Others have expressed the opinion that a true life sentence is a more fitting punishment, that McVeigh be left to his own devices in a cell, unable to escape the consequences of the act he has committed. Many also believe that McVeigh and his co-conspirator Terry Nichols did not act alone, and feel the federal trial was designed to hold one person accountable, to present the public with a convenient scapegoat.

Of the 1,100 people invited to view the execution, approximately 250 have replied that they do wish to witness it. Likely, this will be done via closed circuit television, somewhere in Oklahoma City, as was the trial. The current talk is of closure, of getting on with life. “Closure” is the last argument for death left in this—and any other—case involving capital punishment, however, anecdotal evidence in the form of interviews of surviving relatives has shown that nothing changes once the execution has been performed. Rather, once McVeigh is dead and buried, many who anticipated the execution as the instrument of their own emotional healing will discover that they have been misled, that the processes humans employ to cope with pain and loss are internal. Believing McVeigh’s death to be their emotional deliverance means they have, for the most part, been on hold for over five years, counting on closure to come when one man’s heart stops beating. It is a cruel myth, but the last one left to justify a nation willing to kill its own citizens in the name of justice.

Our newly minted President, George W., proud governor of the most murderous state apparatus in history, will preside over the first in what is shaping up to be a productive federal analog to his home state’s version of justice. There will be at least two executions at the federal level this year, and likely far more than that over the next several years. With the system shown to be in utter disarray, where innocent people really are being executed, Bush is utterly out of step with reality on this issue. His Presidency, carefully managed and scripted by those who propped up Reagan and George W.’s father, will be truly and fully consecrated by McVeigh’s death, which promises to be the most spectacular execution event in U.S. history.

Michael Clyne is a free-lance writer living in Norman, Oklahoma.

 


© STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
All contents are copyrighted. Click here to learn about reprinting text or images that appear on this site.