Search www.satyamag.com

Satya has ceased publication. This website is maintained for informational purposes only.

To learn more about the upcoming Special Edition of Satya and Call for Submissions, click here.

back issues

 

May 1997
Law and Changing the Order

Review Editorial by Julie Hughes
 

 

While the April issue of Satya took a look at those who were in some way going beyond the law to stop environmental destruction or animal abuse, this issue is a look at those who use the law to change things.

An interview with Dan Mills, office co-ordinator of the McLibel Campaign in Great Britain, points out some of the many uses of the law outside the conventional prosecution or defense of a case -- uses which Helena Silverstein, in her book Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement, also indicates are valuable for the progress of social movements such as the animal rights movement. Silverstein argues that law suits can be used to open barriers by highlighting injustices and bringing into public discourse meanings other than those currently defined by law. A law suit, she says, can help educate the public through publicity and consciousness-raising. In addition, she writes, it can provide a focus for a movement and mobilize forces, while at the same time creating potential political pressure and leverage for change.

The McLibel case, just about to conclude, provides the proof of Silverstein's argument, much to McDonald's great dismay. This was a case the multinational corporation thought would never come to court. As a result of the trial, the factsheet McDonald's wished to quash has been displayed more widely, and the practices McDonald's wished to hide publicized more completely, than could ever have been possible if the two defendants hadn't decided to fight.

While author Silverstein protests (perhaps too much) that her book is intended to be neither "for" nor "against" animal rights, she nevertheless strongly defends the idea that animal rights neither trivializes human rights nor dilutes the notion of rights to meaninglessness. Animal rights, she argues, works to break down the false demarcations that have been used in the past to establish the superiority of one group over another: i.e., racism, sexism, and now speciesism.

Nevertheless, there are, as Silverstein notes, drawbacks to the use of the concept of animals' rights. First and foremost, is the inadmissibility in court of the term itself -- technically known as "standing." This is clear from David Wolfson's article on farm animals. Increasingly exempted from any anti-cruelty statutes, farm animals will shortly have no protection at all. Silverstein shows that this is a huge problem with the Constitution and law as they currently stand. Animals are still considered property and the objects rather than subjects of the law. Litigation is arduous and often ineffective. And, as Silverstein points out dryly, just as litigation can force the spotlight to shine on injustices and challenge legal meanings within the legal system itself, those in power still have more ability to manipulate legal meaning to their advantage and so disseminate it to the outside world.

Still, animals need a counterclaim against humans. Silverstein argues that the animal protection movement has a strategic, fluid, and sophisticated concept of rights that allows it to be flexible in picking battles and communicating messages to the public. She contends, however, that it does not pay to be too hung up on the total efficacy of rights, because "rights language and litigation are at once constrained by prevailing legal meaning and subject to alternative reconstructions of meaning." This view is offset by professor of law Gary Francione, whose book Rain Without Thunder is reviewed in this issue. Francione's contention is that there is a muddle over animal rights in the animal protection movement, whereby -- in his view falsely -- the advocacy of animal rights is seen as utopian or impractically absolutist.

Silverstein's book -- thorough and readable, yet somewhat over-deliberate in its argument -- is ultimately sanguine about the use of law. While Rod Coronado, whose interview concludes in this issue, may be a victim of the law, he too has used his incarcerated status to focus on other imprisoned beings and our commonality with them.

Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement by Helena Silverstein. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor (1996). $39.50 hbd. 312 pages.

 


© STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
All contents are copyrighted. Click here to learn about reprinting text or images that appear on this site.